Literature Review: Factors affecting cardiovascular health

Introduction

Blood pressure is considered to be a well-established measure of cardiovascular health (Kelley, Kelley & Tran, 2001) and is determined by both genetic and environmental factors (Turnpenny & Ellard 2005). Hypertension, or high blood pressure, is unique in that it can simultaneously be regarded as a cardiovascular disease in itself and a risk factor (Powers & Dodd 2003). Various studies have found positive associations between hypertension and risk of developing coronary heart disease (e.g. Wang et al. 2006). Identification of the genes involved in hypertension is an extremely well researched area. Recent research by Zhu et al (2005) has found evidence for loci of major importance in influencing hypertension on chromosomes 6q24 and 21q21.

Despite the identification of large numbers of genetic loci that are potentially involved in the determination of cardiovascular health and disease, the results are inconsistent. One of the main criticisms of genetic association studies is failure to replicate findings; Hirschorn et al. (2002, as cited in Sturm 2004) showed that only 3.6 % of associations between common gene variants and disease have been consistently replicated.

Evidence suggests that cardiovascular disease is a multifactorial disorder, i.e. cardiovascular health is determined by multiple genetic and environmental factors (Powers & Dodd 2003; Turnpenny & Ellard 2005). Although several susceptibility loci associated with cardiovascular disease and its risk factors have been found, we do not currently have a complete understanding of the complex genetics involved. However, Sturm (2004) argues that the primary goal of cardiovascular genetic research can now be achieved to reduce morbidity and mortality due to cardiovascular disease by identifying people who are most at risk through genetic counselling. As well as possible drug therapy, a key component of this counselling should be an individualised plan to include lifestyle changes to improve cardiovascular health and reduce the risk of disease. This review will now focus on the role of lifestyle factors in cardiovascular health and disease.

Physical Activity

Lack of physical activity has been recognised as a major risk factor for cardiovascular disease since 1992 (Powers & Dodd 2003). There is indisputable evidence to show that regular exercise is effective for improving cardiovascular health and reducing disease. This evidence comes from both laboratory studies of monkeys (e.g. Williams et al. 2003) and natural studies of both leisure and occupational activity in humans (e.g. Noda et al. 2005; Hu et al. 2005). In spite of this evidence, many people still do not engage in frequent physical activity. Relative to other risk factors for cardiovascular disease, a sedentary lifestyle is of high prevalence (as illustrated in Figure 2).

General

This is a first class scientific review. It is written in concise and accurate scientific language, demonstrating considerable background reading, which is introduced naturally to support the flow of the argument. Sentences follow one another in a logical manner, and are grammatically correct as well as stylistically elegant. The student displays clear understanding of the subject and the use of contemporary references including articles as well as text books makes the work read authoritatively.

View linked text

Quality: Structure

The use of a heading at the start of a long piece of scientific work (this review is over 3,000 words) is a helpful device. It helps to highlight the separate sections, allowing the reader to easily identify what is coming next.

View linked text

A new section of the review has been introduced at the end of one section, with a clear statement of intent regarding what is coming next. It is good practice to flag up intentions in this way, as the reader now understands how the work will develop.

View linked text

Function: Describe

This descriptive statement performs a number of functions well. It introduces blood pressure as the topic of the paragraph. It establishes two key facts that lay the foundation for the discussion that follows. And it uses appropriate language from the start. Notice how assuming that the reader is familiar with concepts such as "cardiovascular health" and "genetic factors" (appropriate at this level) saves unnecessary explanation and makes the writer sound authoritative.

View linked text

The writer presents a number of facts about hypertension, all of them clearly relevant to the essay topic of risk. The sentences follow in logical order, so the use of linking words is not essential. The writer demonstrates wide reading by introducing appropriate and recent sources of evidence from journal articles.

View linked text

Quality: Voice

The use of "despite" warns us of a concession: one fact (identification of large numbers of loci) is qualified by another (inconsistent results). In this way the student writer shows the clear relationship between parts of a sentence.

View linked text

The use of a semi-colon to link two halves of a sentence is sophisticated and appropriate here, where the second phrase confirms and adds detail to the first.

View linked text

Use of the phrase "Evidence suggests" tells us that the following statement is likely but not proven: that although two references are cited in support, there may be other evidence against. Use of the term "proves" or "demonstrates" would be more categorical.

View linked text

This section of the review displays a sophisticated writing style and good use of scientific language. There is a combination of short and long sentences, which help the writing to flow. A variety of linking words ("although", "however", "as well as") make clear how ideas relate to one another within and between sentences. There is excellent use of technical scientific terms that are all spelled correctly and used in their correct, natural context, with supporting references.

View linked text

The pronoun "we " is used inclusively here to refer to the general scientific community. Its use is entirely acceptable in this context.

View linked text

This sentence is very similar in style and function to the opening sentence of the first section and in fact balances it very well. The reader can feel reassured that a similar approach is being taken in this section.

View linked text

Function: Analyse

The writer analyses the studies that have just been presented, highlighting a weakness in studies of this kind in general. This weakness is evidenced by another reference - in this case a review which has examined a wide range of other studies, and so lends the writers" statement added credibility.

View linked text

Quality: Authority

This phrase demonstrates far greater certainty about the evidence than "Evidence suggests".

View linked text

The student is referring to a labelled and referenced figure immediately below this paragraph. The use of graphs, figures and tables (with appropriate references) is often good practice in a scientific review. Information can be conveyed clearly, powerfully and concisely in this way. References in the main text should clarify the source of the figure, what it demonstrates, and why it is important.

View linked text